New Mexico proposed school science standards are being revised

New Mexico proposed school science standards

New Mexico’s public education secretary announced revisions made to propose school science standards. In response to a public outcry against the deletion or omission of references to global warming. Evolution and the age of the Earth, in a statement released Tuesday.

Comments at a packed public hearing this week were overwhelmingly critical of state revisions to a set of standards developed by a consortium of states and the National Academy of Sciences.

World’s first digitally encoded data in synthetic molecules read

The Public Education Department indicated that final standards will restore references to the 4.6 billion-year age of the Earth. The rise in global temperatures over the past century and the process of evolution due to genetic variation.

“We have listened to the thoughtful input received and will incorporate many of the suggestions into the New Mexico standards,” Public Education Secretary Christopher Ruszkowski said in a statement.

A complete version of the revised final standards still preparing and not released.

Ruszkowski previously has defended the proposed standards as a way to give local families and teacher’s greater flexibility and local control around science materials, curriculum and content.

Major school districts, science teaching associations, leading scientists at a national weapons laboratory in New Mexico and others expressed fear. The state revisions would short change students by leaving out fundamental components of earth sciences, global warming and genetics.

Scores of people at the public hearing urged the state to adopt an unedited version of Next Generation Science Standards.

Gregory Swift, a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, said he was encouraged that the Public Education Department was redrafting. The standards though still cautious about the outcome.

Seismic waves generated in water causing seismic energy on earth

“I’d like to see the whole set of changes,” he said. “To me this looks like a politician’s idea of a compromise by trying to give everybody something. But that’s not a solid adherence to the science.”

[Source: Associated press]